Wednesday, 1 February 2012

X-Raying ‘X-Ray’ by Ray Davies: Part Two: ‘Sex-Ray?’

Couldn’t resist the title – Sex-Ray sounds like a weapon in a porno version of ‘Star Trek’. Thought about ‘Sex, Ray?’ but this sounded like an invitation, which would be a bit impertinent although I can supply my own tape measure …

No wonder I’m having trouble coming to any conclusions. In ‘Fancy’, Ray sings,
‘No one can penetrate me. They only see what's in their own fancy, always.’
It’s probably true but I intend to have fun trying. Far be it from me to infer anything here about the choice of the word ‘penetrate’.

Sexuality, orientation and love
Ray is such an incredible tease. I mean, you can tell that from watching him perform, flirting with everyone in the audience, and sometimes Dave (see ‘Slum Kids’, about 3.48 minutes in, (dis)gracefully camping it up), leading us all on. There are tons of hints and suggestions about which team he might bat for but they are all as insubstantial as gossamer and likely to disintegrate when touched – there’s nothing tangible or concrete. I’ll investigate some quotes from the book to see if they shed any light on Ray’s predilections or merely cast more deceptive shadows.

‘Even as a child, I was a dirty old man.’
He goes on to confirm this with the following quote about his unsuspecting sisters:
‘Attractive girls who innocently played with me as I took every opportunity to look up their skirts’ (while still in his pram).
It’s hard to believe this although it’s one thing that he has in common with Dave; both of them were sexually aware of their sisters from a young age. There’s an element of the voyeur about Ray. Still, I can't be sure whether this is just a red herring to prove red-bloodedness, if you know what I mean.

‘The Queen’s Coronation was very erotic … I possibly had the first hard-on of my life on Coronation Day’ (aged 8).
There’s no doubt that somewhat unlikely events turn him on.

‘That was the first time I was even remotely ‘turned on’, and it was not by what I had seen but rather by what I felt due to a complete lack of inhibition on the woman’s part.’
The teenage Ray watches a neighbour sunbathe naked, titillated by the fact that she obviously doesn’t mind who watches her: observer rather than participant.

RD declares an early interest in women (or ceremonial occasions) – the Queen, Eydie Gorme, Jill Kennington, his sisters but comes to some peculiar conclusions, such as:
‘Subsequently, whenever I met a woman, I measured her sexuality by the distance between her chin and the tips of her nipples.’
It’s unclear here exactly what he means by ‘sexuality’: a woman’s sex appeal or her appetite for (or ability at) sex. It’s so strange that I don’t disbelieve it. I’m left wondering whether he assesses this by eye or carries a tape measure so that he can check before deciding whether a woman is worth pursuing. The reporter’s reaction is swift and scathing: ‘I thought he was a perverted, over-lustful, degenerate, sexist weirdo.’ But the Ray in X-Ray is never this quick to label and disapprove and in fact, rarely reacts negatively to any of his friends’ peccadilloes, tending to accept people as they are; his ‘young’ self plays devil’s advocate here.

‘The conquest is the most important element, not the execution because after the conquest you are in control. Then you can do anything you want with that object – because that’s what they are. … That’s when you begin to detest them.’
It’s evident that Ray needs to feel as if he’s in control and exercised this need over the Kinks career as well as over his love life. Perhaps once his band mates had capitulated, become subordinated to his will, he ceased to respect them or simply lost interest.

As an Aries, I sympathise. Arians tend to want what we can't have then unexpectedly get it, after which, we don’t want it any more. But it isn’t pure bloody-mindedness; it has more to do with insecurity, fear and low self-esteem.

‘I believe that it is impossible to have sex with anyone you love and respect.’
Oh, Ray. Perhaps said simply to provoke controversy, this could also mean that RD believes that once someone has deigned to have sex with him, he can no longer respect them, either because he doesn’t value himself highly enough to be worthy of their submission (therefore they are poor judges of character) or because they immediately lose their worth once they become attainable. Their value was dependent on their refusal to submit. The combination of these could possibly explain why Ray hasn’t had much success in long-term relationships. Not that I can talk.

Although there are countless descriptions of encounters with girls, of one kind or another, named and unnamed: Cindy, Roxie, Savannah, Anita, Miriam, etc., Ray lives by his creed, tending to idolise and idealise women then dismiss them once they surrender to his desires. He fights shy of any depiction of his marital relations but the overall sense is of desire thwarted and in such a way that he’s made to feel guilty for even having it.

‘Not a poofy type, are you?’
he challenges the researcher when they first meet although he declares he’s not prejudiced with a favourite saying:
‘One up the bum, no harm done as they say in versatile circles.’
The compulsion to mention this so early in the book is telling, implying that this is something he has given some consideration; he goes on to define queer as opposed to gay:
‘One does it because it’s his natural bent, as it were [queer]. … The other does it because it is fashionable [gay]’.
One minute, he seems almost reactionary and quite old-fashioned, the next, refreshingly non-judgemental. Note his playful use of ‘bent’.

‘When you are in despair, any arms are welcome. It doesn’t matter what sex they belong to. People place so much emphasis on gender. Love is love.’
These beliefs are similar to Dave’s. They’re more alike than they think.
I understand this too. Reciprocal affection, a tiny gesture, can be very powerful. Although I’ve had some extremely demonstrative boyfriends, the most romantic thing that ever happened to me was at a Matthew Sweet gig during the terribly moving, somewhat suicidal song ‘Someone to Pull the Trigger’ when a random guy next to me, a stranger, took my hand for the duration of the song. Affection and closeness can exist independent of sexual desire.

‘I thought about the newspaper stories of his sexual ambiguity. Maybe they were true after all. He had been born at a time when homosexuality was still illegal. Although not gay in my opinion, he had lived through the era of the closet queens and his songs were some of the first to sing openly about those poor tortured souls.’
Confused, you will be. The fact that the reporter mentions ‘sexual ambiguity’, only to conclude that RD isn’t gay could be an attempt to put any rumours about this to rest but why bring it up only to discount it? Ray has to tantalise us with the possibility. Songs like ‘Lola’ and ‘On the Outside’ illustrate his affinity with sexual ‘misfits’: cross-dressers, transvestites, closet queens. In ‘Mirror of Love’, as Belle, he teases us with:
‘You're a mean and obscene lover/But you are my dream lover/'Cause even though you treat me bad/You were the best man I ever had’.
There’s a degree of compassion for and perhaps identification with ‘those poor tortured souls’. Of course at the same time, he’s obviously had relationships with women and fathered children. But, boy (or girl), does he look good in make-up! And neither he nor Dave were averse to dressing extravagantly on stage (to illustrate a character, such as Mr Flash or a video story, in drag for ‘Dead End Street’).

Terry
‘I gazed in wonder as his beautiful half-open mouth drew air in and out … I admired his perfect features, soft olive skin, silky chestnut eyebrows poised just beneath a proud, long forehead.’
The intimations begin with this description of his feelings for his nephew Terry (although they are a similar age), in the bed next to him whom he obviously has a crush on. The fact that he feels comfortable divulging these suggests that he’s not worried what people might think, that he’s either secure in his own masculinity, or happy to imply otherwise. Or it could be an unresolved conflict that he never fully confronts and doesn’t feel the need to. However, I’m not someone who believes that so-called straight men can't find other men attractive. My brother once told me that even he fancied Brad Pitt in Interview with a Vampire.

You can't help but feel there was at least some unrequited (or even requited but not acted upon) passion for Terry and that this was partly responsible for the depth of the despair he felt when Terry and his family decided to emigrate.

Of ‘Waterloo Sunset’, Ray has said,
‘It was a fantasy about my sister going off with her boyfriend to a new world.’
Perhaps I’m reaching but my theory is that Terry is, in fact, Terry and that Julie is Ray; in a fantasy world, he is Julie Finkle – the perfect audience he’s always been searching for. After all, he and Dave used to be girls (see this promo for ‘Sitting in the Midday Sun’).

‘Terry said that when he met me at the hotel in Adelaide, he didn’t know whether to shake hands with Dave and me or to hug us. I said that if he had kissed me I would have returned the compliment.’
The fact that their love has not been acted upon, that there has been no consummation and maybe it isn’t needed, has allowed Ray to continue to respect Terry and allowed this love to endure. It’s interesting that he doesn’t report Terry’s reaction to this, leaving us to wonder what it was.

RD seems to combine humour and offhandedness (the ‘one up the bum’ type of saying) as a defence mechanism, as a way of hedging his bets. He’s saying, he isn’t gay, but if he were, would it matter? He could feel his orientation is fluid, malleable and that it’s not really significant anyway. It’s hard to fathom his motives; I don’t believe that he’s afraid of what people think. This is evident when he confounds expectations in interviews and songs and in his affected, effete, somewhat camp, even effeminate, persona on stage. Like in this interview from a much later period:
'I also got the best blow job of my life in the toilet at that place - a wonderful guy'.

It’s as if he’s constantly daring us to speculate. So speculate I will as I’m being led round in ever-decreasing circles by the ringmaster.

‘The fat cowboy explained to RD that he was a closet queen who was after some rough homo action and considered RD too effeminate for this purpose’.
He would rather take the girl Ray is with outside and ‘suck her dick’; she’s more macho than Ray. Echoes of ‘Lola’ here (‘I'm not the world's most masculine man’). Ray seems merely amused by this; we don't know whether he would have gone with the cowboy if he had been chosen.

‘Suddenly he grabbed me and held me close to him, without seeming to know or care who or what I was.’
This illustrates his earlier assertion.
‘Will you hold me for a second? … I don’t want to be intimate or have sex with you, all I want you to do is show some affection … I am not a queer and I do not want your body.’
God, how sweet.

‘Then RD closed his eyes and kissed me gently on the lips.’
‘As a human being, I was a little sickened.’

As a human being myself, I don’t understand how anyone can reject or be nauseated by tenderness. Ray obviously believes this to be a possible reaction, one that he might have had himself in the same situation.

‘He was old, but not past it sexually.’
If he says so himself, which, of course, is exactly what he is doing. Bless.

‘If you’re not prepared to humiliate yourself in order to give somebody else a moment’s pleasure, I don’t believe that you’ve actually lived.’
Does he actually believe that to give himself to someone would necessitate a degree of humiliation? In the sexual act or in the act of relinquishing control or admitting subordination? Or do you simply have to be prepared to do it? Makes you wonder what he would consider to be humiliating but this is never expanded upon although the lyrics to ‘Headmaster’, for instance, convey more a sense of delicious anticipation for the coming punishment than any real fear: ‘Don't tell all my friends I bent over/ … Headmaster please spare me I beg you/Don't make me take my trousers down.’

‘Some men prefer the company of other men. It does not necessarily mean they are gay.’
This is his comment after trying to barter 'that little whore' Dave away to David Watts (as a joke, I’m sure). The latter evidently has more of an interest in Dave than just his company. And Ray knows it.

So, I’m no clearer. How about you? Ray is a man who has affection for other men, or at least responds to their affection for him, not necessarily with any physical demonstration but by rewarding them with his trust (for instance, Colin Wadie, a bachelor in the circle, who shows concern for him). Why should gender make any difference? I think Ray loves both men and women but he has sex with women and, in doing so, destroys his love for them. Or perhaps theirs for him, in the case of Rasa and Chrissie Hynde.


‘Why is true love so difficult to find?’ (‘One More Time’)

27 comments:

  1. I read X-RAY back when it was published and thought it was *a great book*. You have composed a most intriguing, insightful, and well-written piece on the author of it which belies the notion of simply a passing interest in him. I find the last song reference rather interesting ("One More Time") as both Ray Davies *and* Chrissie Hynde have penned songs with this same (exact) title (hers preceded his by several years). Quite frankly, I am inclined to believe *they* were truly meant for each other (as in "true love"); their ongoing "private (?) conversation over the airwaves for all the world to hear" during the past 30+ years would suggest as much. Then again, perhaps, I'm just a hopeless romantic!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments. That’s interesting that they both wrote a song with the same title. Wouldn’t it be good if they got back together? I'm a romantic too. I’m no expert but I think perhaps Dave was right about them being too alike, both constantly craving attention from the other.

      Delete
  2. Hi, sshh. In re same, song title: Being as how R.D. is such a punctilious sort, I would be hard-pressed to believe this was "just a coincidence" or an “accident” on his part that he explicitly copied *her*. Back together? My apologies, Dear, I was indulging in an episode of much-needed, exercise ioc sus, there, having been denied my customary morning glass of vinegar-and-cayenne and suffering mightily from abject withdrawal, as such. Getting back to “Rock-and-Roll’s Battling Bogarts”: 1980-1984, they were like two, magnificent flames---both burning far, far, too hotly, so they brought out the absolute worst in each other’s personalities and musical aesthetics, with but only their beautiful, and heavenly daughter as justification for so much, mutual, emotional pain. Perhaps, now, it *could* be different. Who knows? But, I’m all for new relationships, myself; people should always move forward, not backwards, when it comes to couplings, no? I mean, there’s a *reason* people break up. I would hazard to say, that R.D. will forever be smitten with C.H.’s voice, and, inimitable, “grrrrl” stage presence---who isn’t?! She’s undeniably *fantastic*. As a figurative artist, I find her face to be endlessly fascinating to study. I really enjoyed your *brilliant* article, moreover, I agree with you in re the whole “Julie Finkle” concept; “she” is simply “a literary device,” not a real person who actually exists in his life (and, if so, “she” would be *himself* for a true artist *needs no muse other than him/herself*). “Julie Finkle” is an ideological juxtaposition; the *perfect* touch of class to all of the crude, sex anecdotes and so forth he expounded on, both real and imaginary (which, you must admit, are all laugh-out-loud *hilarious*). How else could’ve someone like Raymond Douglas Davies, a rock star/sex symbol, and *most literate* of that set have written AND *ended* his book…?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting points and I’m sure RD would agree with you, that it’s better to go forward than go back, relationship-wise but then again, if they’re both older and wiser? Reading ‘Kink’, it seems that RD was badly hurt by their break-up so probably wouldn’t go there again. ‘These violent delights have violent ends’ and so on. Me, I tend to get mired in the past too much, a la Fitzgerald’s ‘So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.’ Will have to look up Chrissie’s ‘One More Time’. I really enjoyed the sex anecdotes - they were in a way less prosaically expressed than Dave’s. Great fun. Come on, Ray, write the next part.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Happy Monday, sshh. In re "older and wiser...": Indeed, as Muhammad Ali so sagely put it, "The man who views the world at 50, the same as he did at 20, has wasted 30 years of his life." ["Playboy" - Nov. 1975] I'm fairly certain, if they did re-unite in this day and age, that we wouldn't be seeing any footage of public spats on TMZ. I enjoyed D.D.'s book, KINK, but found it *far more difficult* to follow (talk about a "timeline all mixed-up," as you commented on, in Part One of your X-RAY article). R.D.'s timeline, for me, made perfect sense, as the anecdotes issuing forth from the crusty lips of the half-cocked, septuagenarian, R.D. character flowed logically up and into the early 1970s, conversely, with D.D.'s "stream-of-consciousness" (as it were) auto-bio, I felt as if I were riding on the back of some stoned, cosmic rabbit jumping from one year and decade to another. Envisioning all of these Pop-Rock blokes in Mod Bod finery on one paragraph, only to be forced to “reset” to hideous '70s or ‘80s fashion, then back again to Carnaby Street, with a side “trip” to love beads and bell bottoms was awfully hard on the ol’ inner, movie camera, I tell you. Despite this, however, it *was* great fun and would've been *a perfect rock-and-roll memoir* had he left out all of the personal jabs towards his older brother; that, I found extremely distasteful, and petty, especially, since The Big One had portrayed the little one so fairly, and with *genuine respect* in his own book. Like yourself, I’m looking forward to the continuing, convoluted adventures---both real and imaginary---of R.D.D., but, I would *really* like, more than anything else, to see him mount a new production of “80 Days” someday. *Absolute pure genius*, that was.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know what you mean about Dave’s book – it starts off ok but the further you go, the more confused things get. It seemed that he would suddenly just go off at a tangent or ramble on about something that didn’t seem relevant. I know that it’s very difficult to follow a timeline in any kind of biographical writing; there are so many possible detours and diversions that it’s hard to keep on target. I do admire him for continuing into the 90s. Ray’s book is already so dense though, it’s just as well he stopped there. Dave does express respect and awe for Ray’s talent and empathy for his problems but is pretty harsh on his personality. As I said in another blog, ‘if you prick him, doth he not bleed?’ Ray, on the other hand, is fairly dismissive of Dave’s input, the focus on Dave being more or less limited to his sexcapades and prodigious partying.

      I’ve not heard anything from ‘80 Days’. I only started liking the Kinks halfway through last year so have a lot of catching up to do. It’s brilliant. I’m always discovering new songs.

      Delete
    2. >>I do admire him for continuing into the 90s.<< Yeah: THANKS to The Big One; left to his *own* devices, the little one would’ve missed EVERY, professional Kinks’ deadline from 1969 on---and wouldn't have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it all out of. If it weren't for R.D., keeping a big brotherly, tight reign on the finances of DAVRAY Music LTD, etc., the little one would've *blown it all* on limousine rides and crates of Dom Pérignon for that old bastard, the London taxi driver-cum-"Dr" (major eye-roll, here) Giorgio Kingpin, the Flounder of The Aetherius Thothiety (he had a lisp, I understand---it was *supposed* to be “The Asserious Society” or *something* like that). Golly, Dear Lady Sshh---it just occurred to me---am I gonna have to enlist in the services of some, big, beefy bodyguards (hmmm---yum) to protect me 24/7 from all of these kozmik, Kinkdom fanz (“davotees”) for these rather, dismissive---but well-deserved---ruminations of mine…? Must I invoke, "The Holy Circle" (trust me, it's holier than *any other*) to protect me from the “powerful” incantations from afar; the Hekatian rituals and “sex magick spells” of countless, wildly-masturbating, "Witchiepoo" weirdettes who comprise the basic core of the little one's "Harem Scare ‘em"...? Am I about to implant in your fertile imagination the traumatic vision of a bunch of loony, FAT, white skinned-with-stretch marks-carbuncled-warty-pustuled-varicose veined-middle-to-senior aged---NAKED---human (?) forms engaging in a wild, ceremonial orgy of Anti-Mavarla Ordo Templi Disorientis proportions to END all proportions (and, I *DO* mean “proportions”)…? Alas---Mavarla The Magnificent may not be here, tomorrow, or in the days to follow, Dear Lady, to reply to anything you may elect to insightfully address in this decidedly, most, delicious exchange which you have so very graciously deigned to engage me in, this past week. Hear that sound in the distance? It’s the sound of two hands clapping…and two cheeks commanding the commencement of hundreds of hoochie-koochie “men” and “women” to slap on their “praise music” CDs and pray before many a purty altar, done lit all bright-like, with candles aplenty---all forming a mental (and, I DO mean “mental”) picture in their “minds” of me being transported to that imaginary river, with those imaginary, cement blocks tethering me down into that imaginary death…believing with all of their farts and souls that such said “exercise” will “manifest” into genuine fruition. In your dreams, kooks.

      In re “80 Days”: Indeed, please try to find a copy; you’ll enjoy it, immensely, am sure. Someone in Kinkdom (the eminent, Dave Emlen, for instance) likely, has one to lend or copy for you. There is a mixed-up and truncated travesty of an upload (w/60-70% of the musical's oeuvre) on YouTube which, egregiously, abruptly cuts off when R.D. is singing the last song (“Be Rational”)…cuts off! I don’t understand these fans and obvious, non-musicians who upload the works of others yet treat it all so callously, however, you can hear "Against The Tide" on it (a peach of an R.D. song) as well as, others. I am not “up” on these things, truth be told, but, as far as I know, there exists only a bootleg cassette recording; a demo tape which R.D. recorded 1987. There’s a nice, YT upload of the lush and lovely “Be Rational,” alone (look for the balloon) but, it, too, alas, is not, altogether perfect enough (for me); there’s a slight skip in the last second of it.

      Bless you, and, *thank you*, Dear Lady Sshh: I seldom have anyone---with genuine intelligence and humour---to play with, and, a girl like me gets awfully bored, keeping these considerations to herself, you know? Or, having to see them fly far, too high over the heads of, evidently, less adventurous, and/or lesser minds: You’re an *infinite joy*.

      Delete
  5. Well, it was good hearing from you, Marvala. I hope this gets to you before you reach your watery demise. I’ll light a Dave-shaped candle in remembrance. No – two in view of our correspondence. Let’s not be cheapskate about it. I keep forgetting that this is on the net for everyone to see so I’ll say no more for now in case I get you in any more trouble and your effigy is mutilated prior to the final submersion. I’m sure that the cement blocks will be beautifully decorated if that’s any consolation. I'll check out YouTube for those tracks you mentioned.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. *Happy Friday and Happy 2012 Valentine's Day Weekend*! Hope you've marvellous, celebratory plans (I do). I just want to assuage any fears you may have had that I’d been “hit” (so to speak). I have said my piece---definitively---in re all of the above, and in so doing, have selfishly taken time away from your *refreshingly-creative* and insightful (i.e., fearless) writing since I first read your post above, on Feb. 1st. I love what you’re doing with this KPS Blog because you’re leading others to *discover* this *fantastic body of work*, this comforting oeuvre of R.D.D.’s, where there is something for every one of us “misfits.” In this truly, bleak, “teenage wasteland” that is the current state of the music industry, you are performing a much-needed, public service. Mavy cannot resist one, *final* “dig,” however: >>I’ll light a Dave-shaped candle…<< Ahhh, you mean one shaped like a large phallus, like the ones ladies purchase for their "divorce parties," nowadays, yes? Think on me, fondly, Dear Lady Sshh, as you watch it...melt...down….

    ReplyDelete
  8. >>I do admire him for continuing into the 90s.<< In re-reading this exchange, Dear Sshh, I just realized that I'd *completely misunderstood* your point, here (you were obviously referring to the *extent* of the "timeline" in his auto-bio, not his career, per se, but, alas, I fear my emotions got the better of me). My apologies to you. Again, *thank you* for everything; it's been most enjoyable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you might have misunderstood, but you're not wrong!

      Delete
  9. Oh God, is it Valentine’s Day? Have a good one. Shame that candle melted. Glad that you remain undetected so far, Mavarla. I was ready to scatter petals over the ocean while chanting syllables that as yet mean nothing to me. From one misfit to another.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Glad that you are still evading kapture by the Kink kohorts and painting. Sounds like your local HA are like a supercharged Neighbourhood Watch. Sorry that you seem to be living under siege in suburbia. It’s my birthday today but not celebrating till the weekend. I started the year with an unusual sense of optimism but now it’s only March and it’s already dissipated. Don't know why really. Perhaps it was misplaced to begin with. Very quiet here. Robins, blackbirds, doves and woodpigeons in the garden. The latter started as non-paying bed-and-breakfast guests but now they seem to have graduated to full-board lodgers. I do mention RD in my latest blog on Jackie Leven (an ‘80 Days’ song that I wouldn’t have heard but for you). Should be posting a piece soon on VGPS – just the performance of the one song.

    Don’t get dispirited.

    ReplyDelete
  12. *Happy Birthday* Dear Sshh! I think I am able to say this in time but only, just, before the clock strikes 12 on your side of "the pond" (I am in So. Calif., Stateside). I hope your sister and your beau have shown you *a great time today*. More tomorrow (in another time and place). In "Fringe" we trust. Mavy

    ReplyDelete
  13. I Love "Preservation Act". Wonderfull

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Random visitor here. Being a similar ‘student’, I have some more thoughts and speculation to add, even if I am extremely late to the charge. Longwinded, so I’ll break it up into several posts.

    I tend to absorb information and interpret between the lines so it might be harder to completely source everything I say the way you have. Bear with me as I try to make this coherent, but I’ll try to mostly refer to quotes from Ray himself.

    We know that Ray was incredibly shy and reserved when he was young, and it would seem that he had issues connecting with women, early on. Even looking at the early band photographs, you can totally see his shyness, his awkwardness (absolutely adorable and endearing, IMHO… who are these ridiculous, foolish ladies who overlooked him?).

    Johnny Rogan references several occasions where Ray expressed interest in various girls, to be turned down. I’ll try to find the quote, but I also read where another man associated with the band’s early days pointed out that Ray and Dave were complete opposites when it came to women - how Ray had trouble ‘connecting’.

    My personal impression is that much of the goings on in X-Ray about the early groupies and whatnot - I think they are largely those ‘red-blooded’ red herrings, trying to rewrite himself to some degree, to expectation. I recall somewhere where he referred to the singer of "You Really Got Me" a bit derisively as “a total virgin”. The narrator’s character and musings in X-Ray backs this up, too, I think, on some level. Those descriptions of encounters he gives in the book are very vague and loose, somewhat repetitive, they don’t feel quite genuine to me. And there is kind of ’tone’ to it, like he’s trying to boost that ‘red-blooded’ thing. Perhaps I’m wrong, or half wrong, but I don’t believe he was as sexually prolific during that period, with the groupies, as he would have us believe.

    From the interview with Maureen Cleave, regarding ‘See My Friends’:

    “The song is about homosexuality. I know a person in this business who is quite normal and good-looking, but girls have given him such a rotten deal that he becomes a sort of queer. He has always got his friends. I mean it's like football teams and the way they're always kissing each other. Same sort of thing.”

    More from the Jon Savage bio:
    “It wasn't fiction. I can understand feeling like that. As it didn't come from a deliberate I-want-to write-a-song-about-this, it's difficult to recall the memories. It's about being a youth who is not sure of his sexuality. I remember I said to Rasa one night, "If it wasn't for you, I’d be queer." I think that's a horrible thing to say to someone of seventeen, but I felt that. I was unsure of myself, and I still find it hard to relate to guys who are out with the lads. I remember boxing and at the end of the fight the trainer came on to me and said, "You've got to work on your stomach muscles,' and put his hand on me and started feeling me up. On the surface they're all really mannish, real he-men, but it exists just there. That really made it, for me, a bit of a lie.

    “Maybe I was becoming aware of how destructive women can be, how any kind of love affair can be disruptive. The song is about acceptance: that's the way the situation is, and you must tolerate it. That's not the way I was, so it's quite mature in that sense.”

    His marriage to Rasa didn’t seem to alter that ‘lack’, much, and he expressed his concern at being seen with women because everyone knew he was married (Not a problem, apparently, later on in America).

    I will add the thought that he could also be observing Dave here, and his own explorations and shenanigans as a way to cope with the aftermath of the situation with Sue, such as with his ‘friend’ Michael Aldred. But I think there’s more to it than that, given the totality of all of this, and what he is outright admitting, himself.

    ReplyDelete
  16. To this I would add a quote from Larry Page from “A Complicated Life’, regarding the 1965 American tour:

    Page remembers one run-through where a researcher politely enquired about Ray's hobbies outside music, only to be told, 'plating'. "What's plating, Ray?” he asked. Ray smiled enigmatically. The question was never asked on air.

    Purely being rebellious, or was there more to it? And what about the tongue action, in those earlier clips?

    In feeling so different, in having had the troubles he had as a youth, Ray would also have no doubt been aware of feelings, or lack thereof, of acceptance and understanding:

    “But my only worry now is that being gay may become a fashion. Because, basically, I see us as animals. Yet if we’re abused as kids and we’re longing for love and can’t get that love in the normal hetero way and find we feel affection for somebody of the same sex, you’re not clinically gay but you go with it, maybe because it is the fashion. Of course the best part of it can be that you then find yourself in a whole community that accepts you. But that doesn’t necessarily, as I say, make you gay.”

    You might become a “Dedicated Follower of Fashion”. Or certainly know some.

    As Ray pointed out in the TV interview “I’m Not Like Everybody Else - the World of Ray Davies and the Kinks”, so many of the early Kinks fans were gay. And a lot of Ray’s friends, over the years, as well. I think this quote, as well as the one you source about male company, is about his own realization of how accepted and understood he felt with these men. Like Ned Sherrin. There is an article about their friendship, how Ned understood him (Side note, Ned’s remark about going to Turkish baths on Jermyn Street).

    https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/how-we-met-ray-davies-and-ned-sherrin-1321081.html

    Perhaps the love, that he speaks of.

    I’d also point out, that there was an odd energy in that doc, and they had a way of not letting us hear the questions asked before giving us the answers, making it even more odd and ambiguous. They also interviewed Ned Sherrin on this special, and both he and Ray were clearly being asked questions about Ray’s sexuality. By the end, Ray seemed uncomfortable, and I couldn’t help but wonder if they had badgered him. This was filmed not long after the releases of both autobiographies (and the revelation in Dave’s about Ned’s dinner parties). I wonder if this whole special came about as someone's bright idea to attempt to coax some sort of confession out of him or Ned after reading the books.

    Mama always told me
    The city ladies were bawdy and bold
    And so I searched night and day to catch a kissable lady
    But all that I caught was a cold

    'Cause those stuck-up city ladies
    Didn't notice me walk by
    Now I've got holes in my shoes
    'Cause I've been walkin' the streets all night

    Of course, followed by:

    I was standing with the punks in Praed Street
    When a muscle man came my way
    He said, "Hey, are you gay, can you come out and play?"
    And like a fool, I went and said, "Okay"

    Obviously Ray was walking the London streets from a rather young age. And no doubt the opportunities for ‘arms’, were there, be it on Praed Street, Soho, tube stations, parks, and beyond, all places he frequented and refers to in songs. He himself is putting the idea out there, there in the song. The Journey refers to the journeyman’s lost innocence. And look at all those songs about innocent young girls being corrupted by the Big Black Smoke. He recently referred to The Journey project as "emotional surgery".

    ReplyDelete
  17. You mentioned how the Davies brothers both were sexually prescient from a young age. How Ray says, “Even as a child, I was a dirty old man.” How open minded, nonjudgmental, and accepting Ray is, how unusual or unlikely some of his predilections might be. My theory is that this could really be the core of this - that maybe he is incredibly ‘open’, having what you might call a very ‘wide palate’, and has always been aware of that in some way, knowing it made him different. Perhaps it’s even as simple as just seeing ‘People’ (or just ‘sex’), instead of gender. Like Dave. It could be that it’s about that, more than ‘orientation’, per se. He seems at times more conflicted, thus cagey, about it than Dave is, as you point out, giving contradictory answers depending on the day. The way that people like to neatly define sexuality, on both sides, was no doubt even more the case in times other than our own. You were ‘queer’ or you weren’t. The need to define succinctly would no doubt come from both sides. See also: how Freddie Mercury’s own claims of bisexuality are completely dismissed in Bohemian Rhapsody. Why couldn’t he be bisexual, even if he ultimately did prefer men? Why aren’t Freddie’s own words about himself enough? But there’s a need to keep everyone so neatly categorized. Maybe this is why Ray loves ambiguity so much, maybe it’s his way of flipping the bird.

    His relationship with Rasa, while not explicitly spelled out, doesn’t seem like it was much of a revelation to him, as he pointed out how ‘destructive women can be’. He was still seeking those ‘arms’ elsewhere. The bit in the book about coming back from America on an earlier trip, describing himself as a horny wreck after remaining faithful, rebuffed by a pregnant Rasa, seems to communicate this, especially as he gives nothing elsewhere to indicate otherwise. Given the outcome of their relationship, to be taken with a grain of salt, of course, but still of note given everything else.

    He refers to the emotional affair with the woman he calls “Georgie” in the book. This whole section feels off and cagey to me. Really, Ray, you couldn’t get yourself drunk enough to consummate this one, cagily describing it here, but a few years later you’re all over L.A., running around with Miss Pamela and ‘Savannah’? I don’t believe this is the straight story, spidey senses tingling. I think this is him trying to work it out in a way that he can discuss without admitting the real details. It also gives him a way to explain a song like “Days”.

    I have another theory that is too much to add here (as if this isn’t already so much!), about one particular person who “Georgie” (and later Lola) might have really been. Who a lot of the mid 60s songs might refer to: “End of the Season”, “Afternoon Tea”, possibly “Wicked Annabella”, and ultimately, “Days”, “Berkeley Mews”, and “Lola”. Granted, some of these I think could also be more composite. There are obviously the bits told in both “X-Ray” and perhaps more revealingly, in “Kink” about those dinner parties at Ned Sherrin’s home. Perhaps for another discussion.

    On a message board somewhere, I read a plausible idea that posited that Ray had far more success with women once the Kinks made it back to America. Where those ‘stuck up city ladies’ might have passed him by in London, in America he was an exotic creature, an English rock star. Merely opening his beautiful mouth to speak would garner the pretty ladies’ attention. And it’s in this era that you can really see Ray’s more overt sexual personae starting to blossom. We can speculate, but it seems pretty clear that whatever it was in reality, there was something going on and it was ground shifting for him.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Another quote from an interview about X-Ray:

    "I kind of thought to myself: shall I let people see that much?" he says. "I justified it by saying: you must show the extremes, otherwise you would be lying to everybody. I've toned a lot of it down, actually'." Maybe so, but that still leaves an incident where somebody has sex with a dog.

    "Yeah, but listen - whatever you're into," he laughs. "That was not me personally, I might add." What about the don't'get-me'wrong-I'm-not-queer passages? "I don't know what I am," he laughs again. "I've got female traits in me, male and female. I prefer people who are not ashamed to exhibit both. That doesn't mean to say I have any bias one way or the other."

    I’d also point to the Interview, interview, with Candy Darling, and how they seem to interact with what seems a bit of an understanding of each other, and of course the way he brings up the topic of being attracted to men.

    I likewise think that one of the reasons his affair with Chrissie Hynde was so deep and intense, that he felt he’d ‘lost it all’ when he lost her, could be that she embodies both:

    “The idea of my being a great big huge fat pregnant woman with tits and everything was horrifying. I couldn’t relate to it. I’ve always related to being like a bloke,” said Chrissie, in 1984.

    The yin and yang of “Animal”. I think over time, with different women, he might have come to realize that these were the women who he connected with most - women who were ‘more like men’, who embodied both sets of traits.

    I think this is also a part of the composition of ‘Lola’. This aligns with your point about the scene in the country bar. I think whoever ‘Savannah’ may have been, if she was in fact a woman, she was bold and aggressive and took Ray ‘by the hand’. Shades of Lola in that anecdote, I think.

    “Who the fuck was Lola?” laughs Ray. “Lola was an amalgam of lots of people. But, specifically, it was a person I was dancing with in a club, who turned out to be a man dressed as a really attractive woman. But I only noticed that when I went out into the daylight and saw the stubble on his chin as we caressed. But it’s a love song about a love affair – not in the gay sense, or Oscar Wilde sense – that I couldn’t tell anybody about. It was an affair it was wrong to have and I took that person’s name and formed the vowels in Lola. It was the love that no one will ever know about because it was not meant to exist.”

    I think “Lola” is multiple people, multiple experiences, both male and female. He has elsewhere admitted as much more recently I think, though again I’d need to find that quote. Look at the title, ‘Lo’ and ‘La’, masculine and feminine suffixes. My theory is that it’s about how you can be attracted to someone’s ‘energy’, ‘despite’ yourself, whether that person is a man or a woman. Be that a more feminine man, or a more masculine woman. Making it a transvestite would be the ‘easier’ way to get the overall idea of ambiguity across in a more broadly understood way. And that love affair no one will know about? The ‘real story’ that is too good, ‘no one will guess’? Well he told us about the affair with Savannah, didn’t he? So what affair didn’t he admit to? I speculate that this is the affair he mentions is the one that culminated with the writing of “Days”, as he hinted with “Georgie”, and I think there’s a particular reason that song is so poignant. He still tears up, singing it. In “Imaginary Man”, I think it was? He chokes up, he quickly moves on. It seems like more than just a typical breakup, when he says “and though you’re gone,” I wonder if he perhaps means departed this plane.

    ReplyDelete
  19. All of this, along with your point about Terry’s departure, could help explain a lot of why he was so emotionally tormented in that period, even beyond what we know about the pressures he was dealing with. There could be more to that breakdown in ’66, too, the ‘identity crisis’ aspect of it. Why did he feel the need to run six miles and punch his publicist?

    Crawdaddy, 1975:
    INTERVIEWER: "Ray—are you? gay?"

    RAY (laughs, then quite seriously): "It's like my agent said to me after we put out a song called 'Dedicated Follower of Fashion' in 1966. My agent came up to me and said, 'Ray—are you queer?' I didn't know I was writing that sort of song. I don't mind gay people, people who aren't gay, people who are unhappy, people who are happy-they can all come to our shows. Don't have to be one type of person to like our band. We even have animal lovers coming."

    INTERVIEWER: "But with 'Lola,' and the limp wrist, and that stage routine—‘Isn't this just the greatest ass you've ever seen?’—weren't you encouraging that image?"

    RAY: "Well, it's had a hard time lately, it's not at its best, but it's still a pretty good ass, pretty good ass. Haven't had much chance to keep it in shape."

    INTERVIEWER: "But your persona?"

    RAY:"I don't think it's necessarily gay. I think on certain occasions, the character may be so in love with himself that he gives that appearance to an outsider. Conceit really. It's just—“

    INTERVIEWER: "Just?"

    RAY: “—my wrist is loose. 'Stay loose,' as they say."

    To your point, about Ray, sex, and love, I just came across this quote from Ray re: ‘Fancy’:

    “The song deals with perception. I think love is like something that you hold. You’ve got to put love in your hand like *that*, but you must never grasp it. That’s the secret. If you grasp it, it goes away. It’s got to be allowed to shine. That line, “My love is like a ruby that nobody can see’, it’s a bit possessive but it’s charming. And ‘No one can penetrate me’ - what can I say about that? A virgin! It’s inside me, really. When I started writing that was at the time when people really wanted to find out what was wrong with me. All my life I’ve been able to keep them out.”

    That seems a fitting place to stop!Hopefully this is cohesive. There’s more I could say, many more thoughts. I obviously have way too much time on my hands, trying to X-Ray Ray!

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  22. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Comments deleted due to repetition

    ReplyDelete